Most small businesses waste months writing proposals for topics they were never going to win. We match your technology to the right opportunities — before you write a single page.
SBIR/STTR funding is highly competitive. Applying to the wrong topics — or submitting without resolving compliance issues — wastes months of effort and real money.
The companies that win SBIR funding don't just write better proposals — they apply to the right topics, frame their technology for the right reviewer, and arrive at the submission portal without compliance surprises.
A structured, expert-led analysis that tells you exactly which open topics match your technology, which ones you can realistically win, and what you need to resolve before submitting.
A plain-language document written for founders and technical leads — not government insiders. Every recommendation includes the reasoning behind it so you understand not just what to do, but why.
A note on our methodology: Our topic analysis is grounded in publicly available federal award data from SBIR.gov and USASpending.gov, combined with John's direct experience authoring SBIR and STTR topics and serving as technical point of contact on hundreds of awards at the Office of Naval Research. We tell you what the public record shows and what that experience suggests — not what no one can know. We do not claim to have proprietary intelligence about ongoing agency discussions or competitor submission plans. What we offer is an informed, honest read of the available evidence — and that is more than most applicants ever get.
The Small Business Innovation and Economic Security Act introduced significant new compliance requirements in 2026. Most first-time applicants are unaware of them until it's too late.
With SBIR/STTR reauthorized and the first DoW solicitations now open after a six-month lapse, agencies will be processing a high volume of submissions. Compliance failures that might have been caught informally in prior cycles are now grounds for immediate disqualification.
We screen for these S.3971 requirements before you submit:
Vantage Federal Advisors was founded by John Carney, a 30-year veteran of Department of Navy Research and Development management with deep expertise in exactly the programs most small businesses are trying to access.
John spent his career with the Department of the Navy, including 22 years at the Office of Naval Research, where he authored dozens of SBIR and STTR topics and served as the technical point of contact on hundreds of awards. He knows what program managers write into topics, what reviewers actually look for, and — critically — which signals in a proposal indicate a company that understands the mission versus one that is guessing.
From 2004 to 2020 John served as the ONR Program Manager for the Navy ManTech Program and Navy Manufacturing Science and Technology programs, managing technology transition investments across the defense industrial base. That 16-year tenure overseeing manufacturing technology development — and the critical handoff from demonstration to production — gives him a perspective on defense technology transition that few outside advisors can offer.
That institutional knowledge is the foundation of every assessment Vantage Federal Advisors delivers. When we tell you a topic is or isn't a strong fit for your technology, that judgment comes from someone who has been on the other side of the evaluation table — not from a keyword matching algorithm.
"I spent 30 years with the Department of the Navy — including 16 years managing the Navy ManTech Program — writing the topics that small businesses apply to, evaluating the proposals that came back, and overseeing the transition of technology into production. I know what wins and what doesn't — not in theory, but from thousands of hours at the table."
Answer six questions about your technology and goals. We'll review your responses and follow up within one business day to schedule your intake interview and confirm next steps.